A Personal View on World-Rending Events

VictorB posted this on August 23rd, 2009.
Tagged as , , .
Categorized as Editorials and Thoughts.
Shorthand Link: http://mmeow.net/tw2043

Cataclysm

I’m tak­ing a quick break from writ­ing about Bar­ri­ers to MMO Entry to dis­cuss some recent devel­op­ments related to the MMO world which you might have heard about.

Those who check gam­ing news sources reg­u­larly will have noticed that Bliz­zard is plan­ning on releas­ing an expan­sion which seeks to com­pletely revamp cer­tain aspects of the lore to lure back gamers into the ten­der embrace of the behe­moth, not only by intro­duc­ing a cat­a­clysm into the old world Aze­roth, but by infus­ing the dif­fer­ent races with new classes to adapt to the cat­a­clysm that is about to envelop World of Warcraft.

What does this have to do with MMOs in gen­eral and Lord of the Rings Online in par­tic­u­lar? Well, look­ing at the announce­ment from a crit­i­cal point of view, it seems to all boil down to what gamers want as opposed to what gamers value in the game they’re playing.

The announce­ment of Cat­a­clysm has brought forth a gigan­tic hype machine that essen­tially bowled over most of the com­pe­ti­tion.  It also piqued the inter­est of many blog­gers who thought the leak was a hoax. Tobold, one of the more pro­lific blog­gers out there with regard to MMOs, has even resub­scribed to World of War­craft, if only to see the old world one more time and bid it a fond farewell.

There’s noth­ing wrong with that of course, as the announce­ment was bound to cre­ate these sorts of reac­tions in peo­ple. I think MMO gamers want some­thing new and excit­ing to enjoy, and they want a breadth and depth of expe­ri­ence that makes them both feel com­fort­able and adven­tur­ous at the same time. For some, it doesn’t mat­ter how they get that new expe­ri­ence, but for oth­ers, myself included, there are stip­u­la­tions to acquir­ing that new feeling.

The thing that I find off, I sup­pose, is that the lore of WoW has been con­stantly chang­ing (note that I didn’t say evolv­ing) to fit the needs of the game. While I can under­stand the addi­tion of new races from a lore aspect, the abil­ity of the Tau­ren race to sud­denly be able to wield the power of the Light baf­fles me, because they’re such a shaman­is­tic race to begin with.

This is con­trary, to some extent, to other games, wherein a cer­tain respect to lore exists. Sure, you can take some lib­er­ties with the lore in LotRO and cre­ate ene­mies of cer­tain things that were never for­mally seen in the books, but that’s not so bad. Chang­ing the lore to allow for peo­ple to sat­isfy their desire to do some­thing new just makes me feel a lit­tle sad.

WoW, LotRO, WAR, and all the other MMOs out there have their own bits of respec­tive lore, and I think that lore should, to some extent, remain as core to the game. Bring in all the hell­fire and brim­stone you want to change the world, if the lore can sup­port it, but don’t sim­ply change the lore for the sake of appeas­ing the fan­base and mak­ing more money.

This does bring into ques­tion my align­ment towards the game. Will I go back to WoW when the game gets released? There’s a good chance of that hap­pen­ing, sure. Will I like it? Per­haps. Will I respect Bliz­zard for what it’s doing? Not as much as I used to, at least with respect to WoW’s lore. Call me cau­tious about the whole thing, I sup­pose, because until details have been final­ized in the code, I’m going to watch Bliz­zard to see if they man­gle the lore fur­ther or give it some respect.

Related posts

7 Responses to 'A Personal View on World-Rending Events'

  1. Alcasm says:

    I’m not about to fault Bliz­zard for alter­ing their lore for the sake of their busi­ness (though they hardly need more), after all, gam­ing isn’t just a game for devel­op­ers. I do like how this rein­forces my belief that WoW has no real integrity with respect to its set­ting how­ever as that has always been what put me off from play­ing the game and it always annoyed me when peo­ple who loved the game would try to pass it off as some lit­er­ary mas­ter­piece within the MMO genre.

    Obvi­ously we haven’t seen any real mas­ter­pieces within MMOs yet, although a case could cer­tainly be made for EVE Online. But this move by Bliz­zard, assign­ing all classes to all races, really hurts any move­ment in such a direc­tion. It reminds me of how ADnD 2nd Edi­tion had such harsh restric­tions on race and class and then 3rd Edi­tion just elim­i­nated the restric­tions com­pletely. I think it really speaks to lazi­ness on Blizzard’s part ulti­mately, it takes far less effort to churn out revamps to the lore than it does to intro­duce a new class, and Bliz­zard has no excuse for being lazy con­sid­er­ing their sub­scrip­tion num­bers. Why they couldn’t instead intro­duce a new Hero class is beyond me as I would think that would excite the play­ers a hell of a lot more, but I sup­pose they will take what they can get.

    • VictorB says:

      As a clar­i­fi­ca­tion, it’s not exactly open­ing up all classes to all races, but in some cases, some of the new race-class com­bi­na­tions kind of throw the lore out the window.

      That kind of dis­re­gard rubs me the wrong way, I suppose.

  2. jdw says:

    How did the Tau­ren gain the abil­ity to use the power of Light?

    “Aliens did it.”

  3. Longasc says:

    Alcasm is right, Bliz­zard gives a damn about its world and lore. The WoW story is even worse than some of the worst sto­ries writ­ten for D&D. But peo­ple let Bliz­zard get away with it and are even excited about it.

    Some­thing hap­pened after War­craft 2, a hype train started rolling that has not stopped since that time. I liked War­craft 1 the most, but then Met­zen went mad and I won­der why so many peo­ple can stand his broad shoul­der fetish.

    Blizz does all for the effect, giv­ing a damn about logic and con­ti­nu­ity, as many mod­ern films do.

    But this does not cre­ate a “world”, even low level role­play­ing in such a shitty set­ting is unful­fill­ing and use­less, I would even say just impossible.

    Flight has reg­u­larly to be switched off in bat­tle­grounds, makes the world feel even smaller and sac­ri­fices basi­cally all world design for the kick of fly­ing for flying’s sake.

    But peo­ple already resub­scribe to WoW again, right now, because a cat­a­clysm was announced for late 2010. They might also sell us the revamped Dia­blo and Star­craft series around that time for more money (pay for maps, game bro­ken up in 3 chap­ters and so on)

    Blizz is a phe­nom­e­non — they can do for what oth­ers would be flogged. They are good, no doubt, but every­one sees to turn a blind eye once they screw up and fan­bois come to the rescue.

    Talk about WoW PvP and class bal­ance in gen­eral… it is not there at all. Think about Pal­adins and DK’s who were quite inten­tion­ally over­pow­ered in patch 3.0 and now are with DK’s and druids the most played classes.

    Peo­ple tend to for­get all that and go back to a fac­tion grind dailies, then raid game with a lore that makes one laugh hard.

    If Blizz takes a dump on their play­ers heads, peo­ple are excited. Other com­pa­nies cre­ate cool stuff, too, but they are much more ques­tioned and crit­i­cized while Blizz gets away with answers like that:

    Q:Why are there Wor­gen DKs?
    A:Because it’s cool?

    • Alcasm says:

      It actu­ally reminds me quite strongly of Bethesda’s flawed design aes­thetic when it came to Fall­out 3. They would insert stuff into the game for no more rea­son than that it was “cool”, game lore be damned. Cou­ple that with an almost com­plete dis­re­gard for the setting’s lore in gen­eral and you get a bas­tardiza­tion of the Fall­out uni­verse. Fall­out 2 shared this prob­lem to a lesser extent (thank­fully it had tal­ent such as Chris Avel­lone work­ing to dis­guise it as best they could) but it was try­ing to evolve the Fall­out uni­verse whereas Fall­out 3 is just a shame­less attempt to ape ele­ments of the orig­i­nals. It all boils down to con­sis­tency and real­iz­ing that some­times you have to sac­ri­fice “cool” to main­tain verisimilitude.

  4. My brother-in-law is orig­i­nally from Mex­ico and nev­er­the­less strug­gles to speak clear Eng­lish. His ESL teacher sug­gested that he watch Amer­i­can tele­vi­sion exhibits to pick up on idioms which are com­monly uti­lized. He loves to Get Free Dia­blo 2 Items Online. so, every chance he gets, he bor­rows our lap­top to per­form just that. My hus­band and I would like to see him suc­ceed in this goal so we’re con­sid­er­ing pur­chas­ing him a lap­top for his birth­day. He would require to pur­chase World wide web access, but I believe they can afford that on their monthly bud­get. I haven’t addressed this with my sis­ter yet, but hope to this weekend.

  5. Our teenage daugh­ter is thir­teen going on thirty. She is mad now that we cen­sor every­thing she watches. There is quite lit­tle on Tele­vi­sion today that we dis­cover appro­pri­ate for the teenager. A few months ago, we dis­cov­ered that you just can Get Free Dia­blo 2 Items Online. along with quite a few other exhibits. This is good as we can watch a indi­cate and deter­mine whether or not it can be suit­able for just a child of her age. She is quite mature to get a thir­teen year old, but there are points we even now do not con­sider she needs to know about. It’s a fine line we con­tin­u­ously walk, but it is part of our career as parents.

Leave a Reply




Allowed Tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Note: This post is over 6 months old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.